首页> 外文OA文献 >The rise of assertive community interventions in South Africa: a randomized control trial assessing the impact of a modified assertive intervention on readmission rates; a three year follow-up
【2h】

The rise of assertive community interventions in South Africa: a randomized control trial assessing the impact of a modified assertive intervention on readmission rates; a three year follow-up

机译:南非自信社区干预措施的兴起:一项随机对照试验,评估改良的自信干预措施对再入院率的影响;三年的随访

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Many countries have over the last few years incorporated mental health assertive interventions in an attempt to address the repercussions of deinstitutionalization. Recent publications have failed to duplicate the positive outcomes reported initially which has cast doubt on the future of these interventions. We previously reported on 29 patients from a developing country who completed 12 months in an assertive intervention which was a modified version of the international assertive community treatment model. We demonstrated reduction in readmission rates as well as improvements in social functioning compared to patients from the control group. The obvious question was, however, if these outcomes could be sustained for longer periods of time. This study aims to determine if modified assertive interventions in an under-resourced setting can successfully maintain reductions in hospitalizations. Methods Patients suffering from schizophrenia who met a modified version of Weidens’ high frequency criteria were randomized into two groups. One group received a modified assertive intervention based on the international assertive community treatment model. The other group received standard care according to the model of service delivery in this region. Data was collected after 36 months, comparing readmissions and days spent in hospital. Results The results demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Patients in the intervention group had significantly less readmissions (p = 0.007) and spent less days in hospital compared to the patients in the control group (p = 0.013). Conclusion Modified assertive interventions may be successful in reducing readmissions and days spent in hospital in developing countries where standard care services are less comprehensive. These interventions can be tailored in such a way to meet service needs and still remain affordable and feasible within the context of an under-resourced setting.
机译:摘要背景在过去的几年中,许多国家都采取了积极的心理健康干预措施,以解决非机构化的影响。最近的出版物未能复制最初报道的积极成果,这使人们对这些干预措施的未来产生怀疑。我们先前报道了来自发展中国家的29名患者,他们在自信干预中完成了12个月的治疗,这是国际自信社区治疗模型的改进版本。与对照组的患者相比,我们证明了再入院率的降低以及社会功能的改善。但是,显而易见的问题是,这些结果是否可以持续更长的时间。这项研究的目的是确定在资源贫乏地区采用改良的果断干预措施能否成功维持住院率的降低。方法将符合Weidens高频标准修订版的精神分裂症患者随机分为两组。一个小组接受了基于国际自信社区治疗模型的改良自信干预。另一个小组根据该地区的服务提供模式接受了标准护理。 36个月后收集数据,比较再入院率和住院天数。结果结果表明两组之间存在显着差异。与对照组相比,干预组患者的再入院率明显降低(p = 0.007),住院时间更少(p = 0.013)。结论改良的果断干预措施可能会成功减少标准护理服务不够全面的发展中国家的住院率和再住院率。可以以满足服务需求的方式量身定制这些干预措施,并且在资源匮乏的情况下仍然可以负担得起且可行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号